Author Archives: aloys.christinat@unil.ch

Family relationships and patriotism

pp. 136-137 “There’s other stuff…” to “…a huge burning effigy of El Líder”

In Dreaming in Cuban, Cristina Garcia draws the complex picture of a family strongly affected by political changes. Each character has its own opinion about politics, which someway defines each of them. Pilar’s relationship to her mother can be seen as a political fight between the two of them. Pilar’s first person narrative expresses this opinion through the passage, as she constantly associates her mother with an excessive patriotism. Rather than describing a familial duality, their relationship is illustrated by these political tensions. In this passage, Pilar argues about three patriotic features of her mother she cannot stand: national pride through parades and national days, American food, and Lourde as a control freak. Nonetheless, these features must be taken from Pilar’s very own point of view. This intimate point of view might be considered as a key to read Pilar’s passages.

Each parade and national day represents a country for its virtues the most vivid way. Here, Pilar quotes the two most celebrated ones: Thanksgiving Day and the Rose Parade on New Year’s Day. As these days are celebrated through the whole country, Lourdes gets naturally enthusiastic. Although Pilar directly states that “the worst is the parades” (137), she then focuses more precisely on what her mother does during those. Rather than identifying what upsets her with national days, she mainly denounces Lourdes behavior. The striking use of irony and sarcasm depicts Pilar’s humor and own language, when she mocks her mother with “like we’re going to starve right there on Fifth Avenue” (137), and “like maybe a huge burning effigy of El Líder” (137). This language, expressed through the first person narration, leads the reader inside Pilar’s mind. It emphasizes the intimate aspect of these reflections, confronting the reader’s neutrality. One can be more distant with the third person narrated passages, but Pilar’s ones require a decision from the reader: to support her or not. This way, a strong opposition between the daughter and the mother is created by the means of language through a political opinion.

Pilar makes numerous comments on her mother’s habits with food. Although she did not experience much of the Cuban food culture, she seems very critical about the American one. Her opinion has much to do with the American lifestyle itself, and its relation to obesity. She ironizes her mother “barbecuing anything she can get her hands on” and “[making] food only people in Ohio eat” (137). At first, these hyperboles seem to criticize American food itself and its excessiveness. But it can also be seen as the characterization of Lourdes’ obsession with food. It depicts a form of patriotism in the food itself. Pilar highlights the place that food takes in Lourdes mind, as if it blinds her from other problems. She deplores they only “sit around behind the warehouse and stare at each other with nothing to say” (137).  This aims again at Lourdes’ behavior more than American food itself. Pilar does not comment or give any bad opinion on it. She rather criticizes the enthusiastic, devoted and obsessional patriotism of her mother, through Lourdes’ relation to food.

Control and security are also patriotic features Pilar blames on Lourdes. They probably are the most problematic ones according to Pilar as she is in a rebellious “teenage” period. The first half of the passage shows very strong words that belong to this specific military lexical field: “spies”, “patrol”, “keep me in line” (136), “tyrant” (137). It is of course another way for Pilar to make fun of her mother. It also relates to her recent new job as an auxiliary policewoman which Pilar does not like. The more zealous Lourdes gets in her job, the more Pilar misunderstands this behavior. Pilar names it a “misplaced sense of civic duty” (136), referring to her own political opinion. This also has to do with her relation with Max, which can be seen as a personification of the young hippie, playing in a rock band. But Pilar seems more concerned with her mother’s way of controlling what surrounds her. She ironically considers Lourdes as a “frustrated tyrant” (137). This hyperbole tends to define her mother like a political identity, rather than using the familial link they share. Max himself uses a more affective term to describes Pilar’s mother, “more like a bitch goddess” (137).

Although she mocks the “ghost patrol” (136) her mother forms with Abuelo Jorge, Pilar directly distances herself with the parenthesis “(which I’m not)” (136). This is written in a “personal dairy” form, and one can wonder whether this really is Pilar’s personal diary or not. The same feature is found on the next page where she describes herself “(five feet eight inch)” (137) and her hair “(black, down to my waist)” (137). This writing feature brings the reader more deeply inside Pilar’s mind than any other narratives in Dreaming in Cuban. It emphasizes the complex and conflictual relationship the daughter and mother share, suggesting to chose a right side.

Considering this relationship from Pilar’s point of view stays narrowed regarding a much more complex outline through the whole novel. Nonetheless, the chosen passage illustrates well Pilar’s emotional aspect through political opinions. Along with others Pilar’s passages, the narrative flow tries to catch the reader’s attention into the daughter’s mind and reflections. Her resistant ideas play a great role in this construction to assert Pilar as the anti-patriotic, rebellious teenage. It also enhances her sensible capacity, which is first presented through her artistic practices. Exaggerating Lourdes’ patriotic behavior draws the relationship in a “more political than affective” way that fits very well to Pilar’s revolted state of mind. Lourdes’ motherhood is depicted in a tyrannical way that can be related to others characters’ experiences in Garcia’s novel.

Swinging Body

In Dreaming in Cuban, the reader is confronted with very different characters, described in various perspectives. Compared to Celia or Pilar’s complex character developments, Lourdes doesn’t appear as a round character at the first sight. This is emphasized as she often states down to earth, black and white judgments – especially facing her daughter, through her own point of view. However, Lourdes’s relationship to her own body gives the reader another comprehension of her character. It helps the character development as much as the narrative during Lourdes’s passages. Her body undergoes extreme experiences through the novel that highlight Lourdes’ willpower, need for control and freedom. Tree main moments helps this understanding: Lourde’s rape, her instable libido and her eating disorder.

Lourdes’s rape by a revolutionary soldier in Cuba (Garcia 71) plays a big role in the narrative process concerning her character. This episode can be seen as the fight between Lourdes and the patriarchal state, which is personified in the soldier. When he notes that “the woman of the house is a fighter” (71), the soldier has to show power over her. He represents the social and cultural power of the revolution. The same way McClintock describes imperialism penetrating a country (Edward 96), this soldier politically overpowers Lourdes by raping her. This act is kept secret by Lourdes and remembered for the first time years later in the narration, when Jorge tells his daughter “[he knows] about the soldier” (Garcia 196). But mentioning it is almost pointless, because remembering the rape might be part of Lourdes’ everyday behavior. This way the memory of it acts upon Lourdes’ way of thinking and reacting. Some of her reactions are predictable along the novel, such as her worries about Pilar’s sexuality. One can read the rape passage as a defining moment helping the narrative and character development of Lourdes.

The relationship between Rufino and Lourdes shows a one-way domination. It is not only underlined by their professional life, but also by a physical domination of Lourdes over her husband. This domination is linked to Lourdes eating disorder: during the first chapters, she is rather acted upon by her desires than mastering them. This is even poetically specified, as “she submitted to them like a somnambulist to a dream” (Garcia 21). This element adds complexity to Lourdes’ relationship to her body because of its ambivalence. Indeed, she is subjecting herself to her libido, which is subjecting Rufino himself – “[begging] his wife for a few nights’ peace” (21). Lourdes therefore reveals a more savage aspect of her character, that she does not control, nor wish to control. This point contrasts strongly with her way to run the family.

Considering the first argument about the rape’s memory, one can also read Lourdes libido as a way to “reconstruct her gendered identity” (Furman 33), alongside the American lifestyle she embraced. Lourdes uses a form of authority she has experienced through her rape, in a playful way with Rufino: she rings a bell to call him to the bedroom (Garcia 21). Furthermore, she exhausts her husband so much it is almost a form of harassment. This behavior might be a way to erase the rape’s memory, as it is suggested in “Lourdes (was) reaching through Rufino for something he could not give her, she wasn’t sure what” (21). This previous quote subtly opens another dimension to Lourdes character and how it is going to be narrated. Later on, she completely stops to have sex with her husband, in a purification ideal related to her extreme diet. Her abstinence also depicts the search for a new identity, and expresses Lourdes’ struggle via her body. What she can not tell to the reader, she shows it through a certain fleshly language.

Moreover, this body language is best illustrated through Lourdes’ compulsive eating disorders. As mentioned, these disorders are linked to her sexual appetite, but not only. Lourdes’ ups and downs develop her emotional state as well as her search for identity. When she decides to stop eating for months, she demonstrates her characteristic willpower: “willpower goes a long way getting toward what you want” (Garcia 172). In opposition with her rape, Lourdes shows she has finally power over her own body. It is no longer acted upon. This way she erases the painful memory and gets free by starving herself. One can regard this as a way for Lourdes to “write the self”, such as observed in Minh-ha’s proposal (Edward 105). Using another language enables Lourdes to get over what enslaves her. It is another way to show authority without using traditional means of power. By subverting the patriarchal and cultural language she is submitted to, Lourdes access to a form of liberation (Edward 105).

This liberation is concluded by the greatest contradiction that makes Lourdes’ body speaks. Finally freed from a memory she is fighting against, Lourdes eats like a glutton at Thanksgiving Day. But her relationship to her body underlines way more than a binary power structure. Rather than considering it as a fight, one can understand it as Lourdes’s own language through the novel. The narration is illustrated by the passive/active role of the body itself. And when this body goes through black and white moment (such as Lourdes’ judgments at some point), it is at first an expression tool. And at very precise moments, Lourdes’s body “[remembers] what her mind has forgotten” (Garcia 224). It is no wonder why she is the best dancer of the family.

 

Bibliography:

EDWARDS, Justin D. Postcolonial literature. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. p. 96-106.

FURMAN, Rachael. Communicating Control: Performing and Voicing Authorial Power through the Female Body in Dreaming in Cuban. Young Scholars In Writing, 2015, vol. 8, p. 30-39.

GARCIA, Cristina. Dreaming in Cuban. Ballantine books, 2011.