Tag Archives: second essay

“Wrestling ghosts in her dreams” Positive and Negative Hauntings Experienced by Lourdes Puente in Cristina Garcia’s Dreaming in Cuban

In Justin D. Edwards’s book on postcolonial literature, he explains that postcolonial writers “invoke spectres and ghosts to represent the devastating effects of colonization and slavery” (Edwards 119). Thus, haunting as a post-colonial literary device is often used to speak about a collective trauma experienced by a nation. In Cristina Garcia’s Dreaming in Cuban, the members of the del Pino family have been affected by the political climate of Cuba; this country thus serves as a setting for a “collective haunting” (Edwards 121), not only for this family, but for all the population of the country as well. Some members of the del Pino family still live in Cuba while others have left the country. Among the latter, Lourdes Puente, who now lives in New York City, appears as the one who is the most haunted by what she has lived in Cuba and only the presence of her father as a ghost seems to have a calming and uplifting effect on her. Indeed, through the setting of Cuba, her memories and her body, Lourdes is haunted by the ghosts from her past, while her father’s ghost serves as a positive presence in her life; thus showing that Lourdes’s haunting is experienced in a personal level.

Lourdes is haunted by the memories of her past linked to the physical setting of Cuba. This country represents all the bad memories she has left behind when leaving for the United States of America. When she learns that her father, Jorge del Pino, has just passed away, “Lourdes imagines [him] … heading south, returning home to their beach, which is mined with sad memories” (24). In this dead metaphor, the use of the adjective “mined” creates the idea that the negative souvenirs from Lourdes’s past are buried in the ground, that they belong to the setting of the house near the beach in Santa Teresa del Mar. This adjective is also related to mines which explode if we walk upon them. Here, the fact that memories are associated to mines reinforces the idea that it is difficult for Lourdes to remember them; that they will explode if she gets too close to them. Thus, we can see that the woman has to hide away to protect herself from the painful memories of her past. In an article focusing on Lourdes’s trauma, Inger Petersson explains that “Lourdes is a woman with repressed experiences and memories” (Petersson 49). Indeed, she has lived things in Cuba that are too painful for her to remember or face directly: the lack of maternal love from her mother, the premature death of her second child and her rape by a soldier. Two of these traumatic experiences happened in the villa where Rufino Puente and Lourdes used to live when they were still in Cuba. When she finally returns to Cuba with her daughter Pilar, she goes back, alone, to this villa which is haunted with memories from her past: “she lost her second child in this place. A baby boy. A boy she would have named Jorge, after her father. A boy, Lourdes recalls, a boy in a soft clot of blood at her feet” (227). The fact that she has lost her child is associated to the “clot of blood” at her feet, which is the embryo. Furthermore, the villa in itself seems haunted by Lourdes’s traumatic experience of a loss of a child. Now that she has been able to face the ghosts of her past, she is afraid that her baby’s death is going to be “absorded quietly by the earth” (227), as if the setting of this Cuban villa had the power to retain or erase these painful events in Lourdes’s life. Therefore, Cuba serves as a setting which contains all the ghosts and painful experiences of Lourdes’s past.

Lourdes, however, does not need to be physically present in Cuba in order to be haunted by the ghosts from her past. Indeed, her body bears the physical marks and trauma that she has experienced. The loss of her child has left an emotional and psychological hole inside her body. Pilar explains that, when sleeping, “[her mother] tossed and turned all night, as if she were wrestling ghosts in her dreams. Sometimes she’d wake up crying, clutching her stomach and moaning from deep inside a place [she] couldn’t understand” (221). We can see that, while she sleeps, Lourdes is tormented by the ghosts from her past. These ghosts are present inside her body, in a place so deep and so hidden that Pilar cannot grasp its significance. This place is what Lourdes’s lost child has left: “Lourdes felt the clot disloge and liquefy beneath her breasts, float through her belly, and slide down her thighs. There was a pool of dark blood at her feet” (70). With this description of the loss of Lourdes’s child, we can see that something physical is going out of her body. She has not just lost her child, but also a part of her; a part of her that would always be present in the villa where she used to live with Rufino. Furthermore, Lourdes is also haunted by the ghost of her child when she is in New York. While sitting near a pool inside a museum with her daughter, “Lourdes is mesmerized by the greenish water, by the sad, sputtering fountain, and a wound inside her reopens” (174). The woman bears in her body the scar of the loss of her child. Because this wound is reopened, her child comes back to haunt her: “Lourdes sees the face of her unborn child, pale and blank as an egg, buoyed by the fountain waters” (174). The presence of water reminds Lourdes of the loss of her child. It is also associated with the color white, with words such as “pale”, “blank” and “egg”. Thus, here, death is paradoxically associated to the color white and to water, which are also linked to giving birth to a child. While the color white often symbolizes purity, here it is associated to death. Just after this traumatic event, Lourdes was raped by a soldier from the revolutionary government: “when he finished, the soldier lifted the knife and began to scratch at Lourdes’s belly with great concentration. A primeval scraping. Crimson hieroglyphics” (72). Lourdes’s body bears a physical trace of her rape: a scar on her belly. However, what the soldier carved is “illegible” (72), as if the reality of this act was too painful to be put into words. Both the loss of Lourdes’s child and her rape are associated with the color red. This color represents here something raw, primitive and violent. It is both associated with Lourdes’s blood and the crimson hieroglyphics on her body. Thus, the traumatic memories of her past in Cuba are present physically on her body, leaving eternal scars and haunting the woman.

While the setting of Cuba and Lourdes body are negatively haunted, the presence of Jorge’s ghost in Lourdes’s life in New York City is perceived as positive and uplifting for the woman. Indeed, “Lourdes is herself only with her father. Even after his death, they understand each other perfectly, as they always have” (31). Jorge del Pino’s presence is stronger when he is a ghost than when he was alive. The time before his death is just alluded to. On the other hand, when he is a ghost, his conversations with Lourdes and his words are transcribed in direct speech: “‘Mi hija, have you forgotten me?’ Jorge del Pino chides gently” (73). In addition to having direct transcription of what he says, we also have indications on his attitude towards his daughter and on the way he speaks to her: he scolds her in a tender manner. Inger Pettersson analyzes the relationship between Lourdes and Jorge with the concept of “borderless communication” (Pettersson 50). Indeed, their discussions transcend life and death. Developing on the idea that their relationship is positive for Lourdes, Pettersson argues that “death, or rather, the company of her dead father, will become Lourdes’s safe space” (Pettersson 50). While the death of her second child is associated to Lourdes’s sad memories from her past in Cuba, the ghost of her father embodies a positive presence in her life in New York City. Jorge helps Lourdes face the grudges she still feels for her mother and he tries to explain to her that he has also played a part in making Celia turning away from her daughter (194-197). Edwards, while referring to Toni Morrison’s treatment of haunting in her novel Beloved, explains that,

The literary use of haunting offers the possibility of representing ‘unspeakable things unspoken’. That is, the spectral can, in some cases, capture that which is beyond language, particularly experiences that are traumatic, psychologically wounding, emotionally scarring or physically harsh. (Edwards 119)

Indeed, the presence of a ghost can sometimes represent an unfinished business or something that the person, who is being haunted, has hidden away because she or he was too afraid to confront it. When Jorge explains to his daughter that she must go back to Cuba, Lourdes tells her father that he does not understand. She “cries and searches the breeze above her. She smells the brilliantined hair, feels the scraping blade, the web of scars it left on her stomach” (196). Indeed, Jorge confronts her daughter with memories of her past and, while being a positive presence in her life, he is also a constant reminder that Lourdes has not faced the traumatic experiences that she has lived in Cuba. When her father mentions Cuba, the ghost of the soldier who raped her reappears in her mind as a scent. Furthermore, she can feel again the pain that the scar she bears has left on her belly. Indeed, the presence of Jorge as a ghost in Lourdes’s life is positive but also incarnates a lucid reminder that Lourdes must face the ghosts from her past that still haunt her physically and psychologically.

Going back to this notion of “collective haunting” developed by Edwards, the characters of Dreaming in Cuban, as well as the Cuban country as a whole, are haunted by the political trauma that has marked Cuba history. Edwards explains that “in postcolonial writing […] the body politic is sometimes represented as being haunted by history” (Edwards 121). In the novel, the allusions to political figures like Batista (162), the omnipresence of Fidel Castro under the nickname “El Líder” and the allusions to events of Cuban history such as the Bay of Pigs invasion (3,25) reinforce the fact that all members of the del Pino family are affected by this Cuban history. However, Lourdes appears as the character who is the most haunted by the ghosts of her past. She has been mentally and physically marked by her traumatic experiences in Cuba. This country thus serves as a setting where ghosts and memories are still vivid and present. Lourdes’s body is also marked by the loss of her child and by her rape. However, by leaving Cuba, Lourdes did not choose to face the ghosts of her past. Thus, when Jorge died, he came back as a ghost to remind his daughter that she must face these sad memories. It is interesting to notice that the woman would have named her second child Jorge; just like her own father (227). Thus, the two ghosts are strongly associated in Lourdes’s life; however, they both play different roles in her life. While the existence of her child as a ghost is painful, her father’s presence as a ghost is calming and positive. Jorge also embodies Lourdes’s past in Cuba and the fact that she will inevitably have to go back there in order to deal with her troubled past.

Works cited:

Edwards, Justin D. “Haunting.” Postcolonial literature. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 118- 128.

Pettersson, Inger. “Telling it to the Dead: Bordeless Communication and Scars of Trauma in Cristina Garcia’s Dreaming in Cuban.” Journal of Literary Studies. University of South Africa, 2013. 18 November 2016. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02564718.2013.777143>

Fictional History and True Memory

Here is my second essay, discussing the theme of “memory” in Cristina Garcìa’s Dreaming in Cuban, it is entitled Fictional History and True Memory. Here it is:

Fictional History and True Memory

Between 1952 and 1959, Cuba was subject to the dictator Fulgencio Batista who supported U.S. business and economy to develop his own profit. All the industry was in their hands and therefore, Cuban people had no power against Batista and the U.S. In this context, the Cuban revolted against the dictator to regain, not only their freedom, but as well their collective identity. Nowadays, Cuba got rid of dictatorship and, “memory becomes an important way of uniting the past with the present” (Justin D. Edwards, 2008 p.130). In her novel Dreaming in Cuban, Cristina Garcìa presents a Cuban family who has partly emigrated to the U.S. after the Cuban revolution. In this novel, memory is a central theme conveyed through the story’s structure, historical facts opposed to that memory and Celia’s letters.

The plot line of the story is not chronological, thus showing that this book is written as if it came from memory. In fact, the story timeline and the plot line are not the same throughout the book. The plot line starts in 1972 and finishes in 1959 (“Celia’s letter” p.249), but passes by 1935 (“Celia’s letters” p.49) or 1980 during the novel. The chapters are therefore not linear because of “Celia’s letters” coming in-between them. “Celia’s letters” are the written proves of Celia’s memory. However, inside the chapters, the plot is not linear as well. For example, in the first chapter “Ocean Blue” happening in 1972, other dates such as 1952 or 1967 referring to historical events are mentioned. This is due to the memory; in order to remember something about our past, we have to do links with what happened during that time, politically, historically, socially, … Memory is not linear and so is not this novel. “The structure … is non-linear and, as such, it follows the flow of … memory” (Edwards 2008, p.131). In addition, this story is told from different points of view, such as Pilar, Celia or Lourdes. It gives an importance to individual memory, whereas the historical elements accentuate collective memory. Mixing different points of view and historical elements, this novel deals with individual and collective memory.

Historical elements are supposed to be facts and therefore non-arguable, however this novel presents an history made by the ones in power and offers a quest for truth. This novel, as Naomi Nakane’s narrative in Joy Kogawa’s novel does, “interweaves two stories, one of the past and another of the present, mixing experience and recollection, history and memory throughout” (Edwards 2008, p.134). A good example of that is on page 28, when Pilar says: “If it were up to me… in Bombay”. It continues with two rhetorical questions: “Why don’t I know anything about them? Who chooses what we should know or what’s important?” She knows the answer; it is the ones in power. It is supported by rhetorical questions in Edwards’ article as well: “What has been erased from the history of colonization? Whose memories are privileged in historical narratives? And whose perspective or point of view is foregrounded in stories about the past?” (Edwards 2008, p.136). Edwards underlines that memory can be used “to explore the complexities of truth” (Edwards 2008, p.137). It contradicts what Pilar says about her mother, with a metaphor replacing her eyes by a “distorting lens” (176). For her, this “lens” prevent her from seeing “what’s really there” (176), the truth. However, Felicia tells his son that “Imagination, like memory, can transform lies to truths” (88). With this sentence, we can understand that it is not what really happened in the past that matters, but rather how we choose to bring together the memories. The sentence “the war that killed … thousands of other blacks is only a footnote in our history book” (185) shows once again that history is written by the ones in power and the only way to know what really happened is memory.

Memory being linked with history; it can be a source of trauma for those under the power during the colonization. According to Cathy Caruth, a trauma must “be spoken in a language that is always somehow literary: a language that defies, even as it claims, our understanding” (Edwards 2008, p.136). It is interesting in Dreaming in Cuban because of Celia’s letters. In fact, the chapters of that book are intertwined with letters that Celia wrote to Gustavo from 1935 to 1959. Reading them afterwards could make them see as memories. However, on page 47 and 48, we can see that for Celia “Memory cannot be confined” (47). She thinks as well that “capturing images [is] an act of cruelty” and that “it [is] an atrocity to sell cameras at El Encanto department store [and] to imprison emotions on squares of glossy paper” (48). This is a personification of images and emotions. So, for her, we cannot fix memories, however, she can relieve them when she encounters a place that was important to her. For example, on page 43: “She imagines him swinging … and shattering her past”. Moreover, for Celia, memories can live through objects, like her pearl earrings. It is a recurrent object in the novel, but it is only on page 38 that we understand its importance: “Celia has removed her drop pearl earrings only nine times, to clean them. No one ever remembers her without them” (38). In this sentence, the pearl earrings are a marker of Celia’s identity. Through the character of Celia, we have a different approach on memory; it is strong, cannot be fixed but can be relieve through objects and places.

Having a non-linear plot line, and opposing history and memory, Dreaming in Cuban offers a mix between individual and collective memory, and presents as well a truth-seeking. It would be interesting to link memory with orality, since “oral information is ephemeral and relies on memory for its durability” (Edwards 2008, p.41). However, we need to be cautious with this theme because “memory is not always perfect; it can distort or change information” (Edwards 2008, p.41).

Bibliography

  • Edwards, Justin. “Orality.” Postcolonial Literature. Hampshire: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2008. Pp.40-50.
  • Edwards, Justin. “Memory.” Postcolonial Literature. Hampshire: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2008. Pp.129-138.

Web Reference